Vol. X No. 5
May 2004
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
CREDIT FOR PERMANENT
DISABILITY ADVANCES ALLOWED
settlement document. The
permanent disability advance
amount was not changed.
However, there was language
that defendant was entitled to
credit for further permanent
disability advances.
The permanent disability
advances after the second
conference were considerably
higher and the carrier took credit
for them.
The applicant filed an
application for penalties and
interest. At trial the applicant
testified that she signed the
settlement under duress. The
Workers' Compensation Judge
found no reason to set aside the
settlement, but only granted the
advances delineated in the
settlement.
Defendant filed a petition for
reconsideration. The Workers'
Compensation Appeals Board
did not allow the further
advances.
The appellate court stated that
the settlement was a legal question
as opposed to a factual question
and resolved by contract
principles.
The contract is the result of
negotiations. The applicant was
aware that she had received
additional permanent disability
advances. The court followed
Escamilla v. WCAB (writ denied)
(1995) 60 CCC 45. This stands for
the proposition that the norm is to
give the employer full credit for
permanent disbility advances.
Editor: Harvey Brown
Firm: Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Address: 18500 Von Karman
#470, Irvine
Phone: 949 644-2694
This is a published
decision.
At a mandatory settlement
conference the applicant rejected
an offer to compromise and
release the case. The settlement
proposed was for $20,000, less
permanent disability advances of
$2,442.87.
At a later conference the
applicant agreed to a settlement
of $24,000. The compromise and
release that was prepared for the
first conference and rejected by
the applicant was used for this
settlement. A 4 was written over
the 0 in 20,000 in the first
In this issue...
County of San Joaquin v.
WCAB .................. 1
Click here for printable version