In this issue...
Green v.WCAB (City of
Compton) . . . . . . . 1
Vol. XI No.4
April 2005
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
Labor Code section 5814 is reviewed
under the new law
This is an Appellate
Court decision that is
published.
T
he applicant claimed an
industrial injury for
orthopedics,
psychiatric and internal injuries.
The applicant filed an application
and indicated vocational
rehabilitation was in issue.
The defendant denied the
case. The parties referred the
applicant to an orthopedist and
psychiatric agreed medical
examiner, who both found the
injury industrial related. The
doctor also recommended
vocational rehabilitation.
The applicant petitioned for
increased compensation under
Labor Code section 5814, for
denying benefits. The parties,
thereafter, entered into a
Stipulation with Requests for
Award for a 58 percent
permanent disability. The penalty
issue was submitted at a trial
without testimony.
The Workers' Compensation
Judge (WCJ) awarded a 10
percent penalty under former
section 5814 against temporary
and permanent disability, medical
treatment and vocational
rehabilitation. The WCJ awarded
only one penalty and the
applicant petitioned for
reconsideration contending a
separate penalty based on each
medical. This all transpired prior
to April 19, 2004.
The appellate court
determined that the new
legislation affected substantive
rights and therefore, the
legislation was retroactive.
The appellate court ruled that
each agreed medical examiner
report was a separate, legally
significant event under the
Chrisitian case so that multiple
penalties might be awarded.
The appellate court also
indicated that applicant waived
his right to vocational
rehabilitation benefits by not
raising the argument before the
Workers' Compensation Appeals
Board.
.
=================
Editor: Harvey Brown
Firm: Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Click here for printable version