Vol. Xl No.7
July 2005
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
The Workers' Compensation Appeals
Board issues apportionment decision
award. The WCJ then issued
rating instructions to the
Disability Evaluation Unit which
yielded an overall rating of 80%.
The disability evaluator
recommended a rating of 31%.
This was the subtraction method
of subtracting the prior 49%
award from the current 80 %
rating. The WCJ agreed and
issued a Findings and Award for
31%.
The applicant attorney filed a
petition for reconsideration
asking that the percentage not be
subtracted but rather the dollar
value be subtracted. The
applicant argued that Fuentes
was no longer controlling
because of the passage of SB
899.
The Workers' Compensation
Appeals Board (WCAB) issued
this en banc decision stating that
Labor Code sections 4663 (c)
and 4664 (a) mandate that the
percentage of disability (not the
dollar amount) be subtracted.
The WCAB indicates the fact
that Fuentes was an analysis of
the apportionment law under
Labor Code section 4750, which
was repealed, does not change
the legislative intent in adopting
the new apportionment statutes.
They indicated you find the
overall permanent disability. You
then subtract the percentage of
permanent disability caused by
other factors under section 4663
(c) or previously awarded under
section 4664 (b).
This is En Banc
decision of the
WCAB,
The applicant sustained an
industrial injury to his low back.
The major issue at the time of
trial was permanent disability
and apportionment. The
applicant had a prior injury at
the same employer to the same
part of the body. The applicant
received a stipulated Award on
the prior injury of 49%.
The current injury went to
trial. The Workers'
Compensation Judge (WCJ) took
judicial notice of the prior 49%
Editor: Harvey Brown Firm:
Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Address: 18500 Von
Karman #470, Irvine Phone:
949 252-1300
In this issue...
Nabors v Piedmont Lumber
and Mill ................ 1
Click here for printable version