In this issue...
Hestehauge v. Wayne
Charkins . . . . . . . . 1
Vol. XI No.10
October 2005
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
In an Opinion on Decision After
Reconsideration Board discusses
applicant working at home
This is a decision by
the WCAB after
reconsideration
T
he applicant had an
injury on November
15, 2000, while
employed by homeowners as a
painter. He had a very serious
injury. He was an Australian
temporarily in California. The
applicant did not testify at trial.
There was no deposition taken of
the applicant, no affidavit, or
statement offered into evidence.
The Workers' Compensation
Judge (WCJ) found the injury
industrial related. The defendant
filed a petition for
reconsideration.
The Workers' Compensation
Appeals Board (WCAB) issued
this decision as a significant panel
decision.
The WCAB analyzed Labor
Code sections 3351 (d) and 3352
(h). The applicant did not work
for a licensed contractor. The
defendant argued this two
sections were applicable to the
facts since the applicant did not
work 52 hours or earn at least
$100.00 in the 90 days prior to
his injury.
The Board found the
applicant was an employee under
Labor Code section 3715 (b).
They determined 3715 (b) applies
to all residential employees even
if there is homeowners insurance.
The Legislature intended
that three types of residential
employees would be
covered under this section.
They indicated if the
applicant would have been
covered by the law in effect
prior to January 1, 1977, and
the work to be performed
was contemplated to last
more than 10 days or the
total labor cost was at least
$100 the applicant was
covered.
====================
Editor: Harvey Brown
Firm: Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Click here for printable version