In this issue..
Pasquotto v Hayward Lumber
Vol. XII No. III
March 2006
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
En Banc decision on apportionment
dealing with Compromise and Release
This is an en banc
decision
T
he applicant filed a
claim alleging two
claims for injury. The
first was in December 2001. It
was an injury to the back. It was
admitted. The second injury was
admitted, and occurred on
August 2, 2002. It also was to
the back.
On May 9, 1998 the applicant
had a back injury. This injury
resulted in the applicant having a
lateral microdiscectomy. The
applicant was rehabilitated. The
case settled by compromise and
Release in September 1999.
The applicant had a pre-
employment physical that he
passed, prior to the current
injuries.
The case was tried by a
Workers' Compensation Judge
(WCJ) who found for the 2001
and 2002 cases the applicant was
not entitled to anything. The WCJ
reasoned the applicant had a prior
disability of no heavy work for
the 1998 injury and the same
restriction for the 2001 and 2002
injuries. Applicant petitioned for
reconsideration. The Workers'
Compensation Appeals Board
issued an en banc decision.
They indicated that a
compromise and release, without
more, is not a basis for
apportioning under Labor Code
section 4664 (b). A compromise
and release does not constitute an
"award of permanent disability".
However, where there is a
prior claim and Compromise and
Release even thought there is no
prior disability, the medical
reports and other evidence may
be "other factors". Under Labor
Code section 4663 "other
factors... including prior injuries"
are a proper basis for
apportionment. Here, the WCJ
did not consider that.
The WCAB did indicate that
you could rehabilitate yourself
from a prior injury under section
4663, but not 4664.
=================
Editor: Harvey Brown
Firm: Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Address: 18500 Von
Karman #470, Irvine
Phone: 949 252-1300
Click here for printable version