In this issue..
Brodie v. WCAB; Welcher v
WCAB
Vol. XIII No.
VI
June 2007
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
Supreme Court finally decides
apportionment case
This is a published
supreme court
decision
T
his is a significant
decision from the
supreme court.
The court looked at five
different decisions of the
Workers' Compensation Appeals
Board (WCAB). All of the cases
had an apportionment issue. In
each case there was either a
previous industrial injury or a
nonindustrial cause for the
permanent disability. In each
case the workers' compensation
judge (WCJ) applied the formula
for apportionment used in
Fuentes v. WCAB.
These cases went up on
appeal resulting in differing
appellate decisions. In Brodie v.
WCAB the court did not adopt
Fuentes. In Welcher v. WCAB
the appellate court followed
Fuentes.
In a very lengthy opinion the
supreme court then went into the
apportionment problem. In a
great discussion they discussed
the history and reasoning of the
apportionment laws. In there
analysis they discuss Labor Code
sections 4658 and 4750.
The law was settled for 28
years until SB 899 was passed in
2004. Labor Code sections 4663
and 4750 were repealed. A
revised section 4663 and a new
4664 section were enacted. This
resulted in the court questioning
whether Fuentes was still good
law.
This resulted in three
different approaches being
applied by various Courts of
Appeal and the WCAB. The
Supreme Court needed to review
to solidify opinion under one
approach.
The Supreme Court reviewed
SB 899 and its legislative history.
They compared the old and new
statutes. They asked the question
whether the legislature intended
to adopt a new and different
formula and determined the
answer was no.
Therefore, Fuentes is still the
law for apportionment.
=================
Editor: Harvey Brown
Firm: Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Address: 18881 Von
Karman # 250 Irvine 92612
Phone: 949 252-1300
Click here for printable version