In this issue..
SCIF v WCAB, Sandhagen
Vol. XIV No.
VIII
August 2008
COMPENSATION
NEWS
MONTHLY REPORT
Supreme Court indicates when an
employer disputes need for treatment you
must use utilization review
This is a Supreme
Court decision of
monumental
proportions.
T
his is a significant
decision involving
interpretation of Labor
Code sections 4610 and 4062.
The applicant incurred an
admitted industrial injury in 2003.
The applicant received medical
treatment and the physician
requested a magnetic resonance
image (MRI). The employer
submitted this request for
utilization review. The employer
did not communicate its decision
within the 14 days required by
Labor Code section 4610.
The applicant attorney
requested an expedited hearing.
The Workers' Compensation
Judge (WCJ) found the employer
failed to comply and ordered the
MRI. The employer filed a
petition for reconsideration.
The Workers' Compensation
Appeals Board ( WCAB) heard
the case en banc and issued a
decision saying that even though
the employer missed the deadline
for review under 4610, they
could still use Labor Code
section 4062. Under 4062 the
employer could dispute the
treating physician.
The employer filed a writ
with the Court of Appeal who
issued an opinion agreeing with
the WCAB. The Court of Appeal
indicated that even though the
employer was precluded from the
utilization review process the
employer could still utilize
section 4062.
The Supreme Court analyzed
Senate Bills 228 and 899and
overturned the lower court
decision. The Supreme Court
determined base on the language
of the statutes that you must use
the utilization review process of
section 4610 and cannot rely on
4062. This is extremely important
since you have to react quickly
within the time constraints of
4610.

=================
Editor: Harvey Brown
Firm: Samuelsen, Gonzalez,
Valenzuela and Brown
Address: 18881 Von
Karman # 250 Irvine 92612
Phone: 949 252-1300
Click here for printable version